Retrial for man convicted in ‘shaken baby’ case
A father convicted of shaking his infant daughter to death has been granted a retrial by Sweden's Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) in a case that could result in a re-examination of other cases of "shaken baby syndrome".
AUTHOR
PUBLISHER
The Local SE
DATE
January 9, 2013

The now 31-year-old man was first convicted in 2005 for shaking his six-week-old daughter so violently that she suffered from fatal cerebral haemorrhaging.
But in a decision issued on Tuesday, the Supreme Court cited new evidence indicating that the man’s daughter could have died from injuries caused by something other than violent shaking.
According to forensic medical expert Peter Krantz, who was quoted in the ruling, “today one can no longer rule out the possibility that the haemorrhaging in the meninges and injuries in the brain of this type can have other causes than bodily harm/shaking”.
The man was first sentenced to five years in prison for manslaughter and aggravated assault. He lodged a number of appeals, with the Supreme Court rejecting a previous retrial request back in 2008.
However, the man fled from Sweden before he began serving his sentence, managing to stay on the run until being arrested in Spain in 2010.
He was imprisoned in Sweden until last autumn when he was released while the Supreme Court reviewed his latest appeal.
“He’s obviously very happy and relieved,” the man’s lawyer, Percy Bratt, told Sveriges Television (SVT) following Tuesday’s decision that his client had been granted a retrial.
Medical expert Krantz told SVT it’s possible the little girl’s death was a result of clotting related to her premature birth.
He added that the diagnosis of “shaken baby syndrome” can be affected by trends in medical diagnosis which shift over time.
“The risk is that people become a bit too liberal in their diagnoses,” he told SVT, adding that new thinking about the condition may result in more retrial requests.
“There may be parents in prison today who have been wrongly accused of causing their child’s death.”
The case will now be re-examined by the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden (Hovrätten för Västra Sverige).
This article or media transcript is attributed fully to the author(s) and publishing agency listed above. This work does not belong to the Family Justice Resource Center—it is shared solely for archival and reference purposes. Any citations should include the original publication, found by following the link above. Transcription may be incomplete and/or contain errors. No revenue is generated by works in this archive. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the Family Justice Resource Center. For any inquiries, revisions, or requests regarding content recorded in this archive, please contact us here.
